This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Solving the UK’s productivity problems with robotics

12 March 2020

Mike Wilson argues that it is time for the UK manufacturing to look seriously at the adoption of automation, and robotics in particular, to help improve productivity figures. 

UK manufacturing faces multiple challenges. Foremost, is that competition from more productive countries is continuing to grow at a pace. Compared with the United States, China, Germany, Japan, India, Poland and France over a 10-year period from 2006 to 2016, the UK was the only country where productivity per person per hour actually decreased (by 9%). All the other countries mentioned saw an increase – with Germany raising its productivity rate by 21%. 

The sector is also facing other serious challenges, including a significant shortage in engineering skills, the rising costs of energy and raw materials, increasing demands for production flexibility, and the still great unknown that is Brexit.

While there is no silver bullet for these scenarios, the UK’s manufacturing sector can go some way to resolving these challenges by using its labour and resources more effectively and working smarter by giving its staff the tools to do their jobs more efficiently – sweating the assets, not the people. Key to this is increasing the adoption of automation and, in particular, robotics to close the gap on our competitors. 

According to the International Federation of Robotics (IFR) robot adoption in the UK is significantly behind that of other more productive countries. South Korea has a robot density of 774 robots per 10,000 employees, Germany is running at 338, the USA at 217, Italy at 200, Spain at 168 and France at 154. The UK, meanwhile, ranks 22nd in the world with a robot density of only 91, below the global average of 99.

Task reallocation
There are, of course, plenty of critics who claim that any increase in robots in the workplace will mean a reduction in jobs for people. But there is much evidence to show that, rather than resulting in job substitution, automation does, in fact, lead to a reallocation of tasks in which robots complement and augment human labour by performing routine or dangerous tasks. This, in turn, provides the opportunity for people to focus on higher-skilled, higher-quality and higher-paid roles. 

In terms of productivity and quality, the benefits of robotic automation cannot be ignored, as the automotive industry can corroborate. The deployment of robots results in an increased yield and a better use of staff, of other equipment and of space and energy and delivers consistently high quality, with reduced waste and reworking. Robotic automation also offers companies improved health and safety, extendable production hours and greater flexibility regarding quick changeovers and product redesign, while offering staff more rewarding jobs. 

While a certain level of investment is required in equipment and training to start the automation process, UK manufacturing has to understand that maintaining the status quo or failing to start investing now is just going to widen the already existing gap in competitiveness with other countries. Therefore, I urge companies to begin the process as soon as possible and appeal to the UK government to lead and support the increased adoption of robots and automation technologies to enhance our productivity and competitiveness in an increasingly challenging global market.

Mike Wilson is managing director at KUKA UK & Ireland and chairman at British Automation & Robot Association (BARA).


Contact Details and Archive...

Print this page | E-mail this page