This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Variable speed control reduces energy consumption and increases system efficiency in refrigeration applications

Author : Abdelhak Dhabi, Global Business Development Manager, Refrigeration Business, Danfoss VLT Drives

27 August 2014

As shown through theory and case study, speed control of refrigeration components provides maximum flexibility, control and energy efficiency.

Most refrigeration systems spend most of their operating hours at reduced capacity. Screw compressors back off slide valves, reciprocating solenoid valve control and other compressor types use on/off. 

Unfortunately, these control methods do not provide the maximum attainable reduction in brake horsepower as refrigerant capacity is reduced.

Frequency converter control
In standard system design, electric motors are intended to operate at a fixed speed. This speed is determined by the frequency of power supplied by the utility and motor design (number of poles). 

The shaft load on the motor is determined by the product of shaft speed and torque. With a fixed speed, motor power is determined by the torque of the load.  With a change in speed, motor load will not only benefit from the speed reduction, but also any reduction in torque with speed. Two types of motor loads exist; constant torque and variable torque.

Positive displacement compressors (e.g., screw, reciprocating, rotary vane) are constant torque devices. That is, the twisting force required to turn the shaft is constant, regardless of speed. Therefore, the shaft power is determined by operating conditions (pressures) and method of capacity control, which both effect torque. In general, a reduction in 50% speed would provide a proportional 50 % reduction in shaft power. (Figure 1)

General drive control
Using frequency converters to control cold storage capacity provide improved control and efficiency, whether for compressors, fans or pumps.

There are several incentives for using speed control on screw compressors:

Drive control will reduce the power penalty associated with slide valve, poppet valve, or throttling capacity control. On compressors with no capacity control, speed control will eliminate other poor control strategies.
Drive control will reduce wear and tear associated with slide valve action.
Drive control allows a precise suction pressure to be maintained. With slide valve, a broad dead band is often maintained to avoid excessive wear.
Drive speed control provides compressor size reduction with the same system capacity demand.

Drive operation of screw compressor 
Almost every rotary screw compressor uses a slide valve for unloading. The slide valve moves along the length of the rotors, reducing the compression length within the rotors. 

Although this control method is infinitely adjustable and provides reasonable suction pressure control, there can be a substantial power penalty associated with slide valve control. As the compressor unloads, there is not a proportional reduction in power. A typical screw compressor part load curve is shown in Figure 2.

In general, part-load performance degrades with deeper suction or higher discharge pressure. Also, economized compressors typically lose economizer operation at approximately 75 % slide position. Below this position, the compressor operates non economized.

Most screw compressors can operate down to 50 % speed, as rated by the factory. Below 50 % speed, the slide valve must be used for further capacity reduction. The improved part-load power curve is shown in Figure 3.

Note the substantial improvement in compressor performance throughout the entire range of loads. 

The concept with a compressor pack with a master drive connected in parallel with several fixed speed compressors is based on intelligent frequency converters. 

These frequency converter types can handle the open-loop and close loop control tasks in the compressor pack. The main function of intelligent frequency converters is to maintain the suction pressure constant by continually adapting the speed of the variable speed compressor. 

The benefit by using cascade control compressors is to reduce the size and the cost and to keep the same or better capacity.

To use drives to control speed increases the COP (coefficient of performance) of the system  and reduces the energy consumption. The comparison is shown in figure 4.

Example 1 
Cost saving comparison between drive operation and slide valve control on screw compressors

Screw compressors used in refrigeration plants come in two types:

a) with slide valve for capacity modulation
b) without any capacity control regime

Although the slide valve control gives reasonable suction pressure control, there is a certain energy consumption associated with the slide valve control.

From the power consumption chart (figure 5) we can see that the slide valve method of control do not follow the capacity control.  In the case of 60 % capacity, the slide valve control consumes approximately 80 % of the power.  Where as, with drive control, at 60 % capacity, the power consumed is approximately 60 %.

Our experience with a customer in Canada with Mycom screw compressor is that we obtained the following results:

Compressor motor data : 315 kW,  560 A @ 380V, cos f = 0.91
Slide valve @ 68 % =  438 A = 260 kW
Slide valve @ 80 % = 450 A =  267 kW
Slide valve @ 100 % = 490 A = 291 kW
(*based on actual measurements)

Assuming average annual capacity is 80 % of the installed capacity, 20 hours working per day and 365 days operation, the comparison of slide valve vs. drive control is given below:

With slide valve :  267 kW x 365 x 20 =  1,949,100 units

With drive control:  Energy consumption is 15% lower = 1,656,735 units

Savings = 292,365 units

Cost savings (@ Rs. 5 per unit) =  Rs.1,461,825

Average installed cost a 315 kW VFD =   Rs. 1,400,000

Payback period = 1 year


Print this page | E-mail this page

RELATED CONTENT...


Article image Albion introduces new range of MCVs

Albion Valves (UK) Ltd has announced the addition of Motorised Control Valves (MCV's) to its ever-expanding product range. 
Full Story...

Article image Advanced motion performance: Applied Motion Products’ new SV200 series digital servo drives are available from Mclennan

Recently announced by Applied Motion Products Inc. (AMP), the USA based motion innovator and available from Mclennan, the new SV200 series intelligent servo drives provide advanced motion performance and extensive functionality to suit a broad range of precision motion applications. Full Story...

World’s most extensive motors, drives and controls offering highlighted in new guide

VACON extends its powers

The Weetabix Food Company drives down its energy costs

RELATED SPONSORED ARTICLES...


Article image Eaton’s new PowerXL variable frequency drives

Diversified industrial manufacturer Eaton Corporation has launched its new PowerXL variable frequency drives with a rating up to 250 kW at this year's SPS/IPC/Drives in NurembergFull Story...

MOST VIEWED...


Article image Spray and save on the glazing process

Food glazes are widely used in the bakery sector to improve the look and taste of baked products. Traditionally, this coating process has resulted in substantial waste. Technology advances mean that this is no longer the case. Full Story...

Article image Getting the Industry 4.0 journey started

Suzanne Gill finds out why the UK food industry needs to embrace the idea of Industry 4.0 and why the journey needs to start now. Full Story...

Your flexible friend in the food factory

Don’t get left out in the cold this Christmas

Automating the temperature monitoring task

http://www.appetite4eng.co.uk