This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Metal detection system validation

10 September 2017

Correct validation of metal detection systems is vital, as these devices have an important role to play in protecting both consumers and food brands from the effects of contaminated end products. 

How can you ensure that your metal detection system is validated correctly, to ensure it is working to specification and within quality control parameters? MDS offers some advice:

For new metal detection systems and processes: When a new project is being designed, many pieces of the process will be tested to ensure that the end product can be manufactured efficiently and consistently. Metal detection, while not generally part of the process that creates a product, is almost always required on the production line to ensure that the end product is safe once packed and ready for onward sale.

Testing products against a range of possible metal contaminants at the design stage is therefore recommended to ensure that the equipment is correctly specified prior to purchase. Wherever possible, samples of all products that will be produced on the line should be made available and a series of tests carried out to determine test sample sizes. The wider the range of variations on the product being produced, the greater the need for a device capable of dealing with variations in the product signal.

During commissioning of a new line, actual factory running conditions need to be reflected wherever possible. As with the pre-order tests, if all products to be manufactured can be made available to the commissioning team, then tests can be conducted with all test samples to ensure that they are correctly detected during normal operation.

Reject systems and control system integration as well as data logging and reporting can all be verified at this point and properly documented for quality control purposes.

By documenting the introduction of the test contaminants and ensuring their accurate detection and rejection, the commissioning team both ensures the production line is ready to start actual production but also creates a procedure for system checks and validation at any future time, as determined by the facilities own quality control procedures.

For existing lines: There is no legislation that determines how often a system is verified and each production process will have its own unique set of requirements. Having said this, the Supermarket Codes of Practice have driven a lot of commonly applied procedures and best practices.

For example, hourly testing of a system has been adopted as a standard and is related to the length of time products remain on site. In very high volume systems this may be reduced to every 30 minutes.

Many modern control systems will monitor all of the external controls for correct operation and should one indicate a fault the system will automatically switch to its failsafe condition. Once the fault has been corrected, the system may then require a manual check before production can resume.

It is impossible to write a standard guide to validating a metal detection system. One size does not fit all, different manufacturers equipment behaves differently, the age of the system will have a bearing on the results and different clients demand distinct quality procedures.

With each system, pre-production testing will identify the best procedures and equipment for the production process; correct commissioning will help refine the procedures for the specific environment encountered on site and the end customer, often defined by Supermarket Codes of Practice, will determine the frequency and manner of ongoing validation and quality control.


Contact Details and Archive...

Print this page | E-mail this page

MOST VIEWED...


Article image Anheuser-Busch InBev’s distribution strategy model

Over the past 10 years Anheuser-Busch InBev (A-B InBev) has grown its global distribution network using a strategy which goes against the grain for traditional brewery specifications. In place of cost and time intensive permanent structures, it has adopted a design-driven approach in partnership with Herchenbach, a manufacturer of temporary buildings and semi-permanent warehouses. Full Story...

Article image A recipe for continuous improvement success

Suzanne Gill reports on the important role that continuous improvement has to play in ensuring food processes remain profitable in an ever more competitive environment. Full Story...

Hygienic drainage for food safety

What role does refrigeration play in the supply chain?

More speed for Tiramisu!

https://eclipsemagnetics-mail.com/p/4G37-24D/free-site-survey