This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Manual boiler blowdown is responsible for boilerhouse overspending

03 July 2017

Mike Griffin believes that the critical boiler blowdown process – which needs to be activated regularly for any active steam boiler – can often inflate the running cost of a typical boiler house, and prevents it from becoming a bona fide unmanned plant. 

Failure to automate the boiler blowdown process is causing a number of industrial steam users to overspend on labour and energy costs. 

While every steam boiler will have a bottom blowdown valve, there is a tendency for many engineers to persist in using the manual valve supplied with the boiler purely because it has always been there.
 
The mistake many make is holding on to the belief that fitting an automated valve is unnecessary or little other than a ‘nice to have’. The reality is that an automated valve actually has a number of tangible benefits and should be considered as a way of improving thermal efficiency in the boilerhouse.
 
Designed to bleed off undissolved solids present in chemically-treated boiler water, a bottom blowdown valve is key to ensuring the boiler remains clean, and that the furnace tube at the bottom of the boiler does not foul. However, by remaining loyal to a manual blowdown process, engineers run the risk of either failing to remove sufficient contaminants, or purging useful thermal energy and treated water.
 
By automating the blowdown process, engineers are able to remove any element of guesswork from the equation, which avoids the risk of too much or too little purging – both of which can prove extremely costly over the long term.
 
When excess energy costs and labour are taken into account, an automatic valve can pay for itself with two years. It also has the added bonus of keeping the boilerhouse operational, efficient, and compliant, even when an engineer isn’t present. Given the growing number of unmanned boilers, these are all huge advantages to be considered.
 
For a valve fitter, time is king, and the latest generation of solution, such as Spirax Sarco’s Bottom Blowdown Valve, takes this into account by being quick and simple to install, and easy to maintain – not to mention designed to work in compliance with the BG01 guidance document. Designed to help reduce unnecessary energy and water losses once programmed, a bottom blowdown valve can help an organisation to hit its energy and sustainability targets, so it should be considered an essential, rather than a optional addition to the typical boiler plant.

Mike Griffin is emerging & innovative technologies manager, Northern Europe at Spirax Sarco.


Contact Details and Archive...

Print this page | E-mail this page

MOST VIEWED...


Article image Artificial intelligence in the food industry

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been heralded as the next best thing since sliced bread. But what might it really mean for the food industry and what are the implications? Stephanie Duvault-Alexandre explains. Full Story...

Article image Reduce, reuse, recover

Taking simple steps to reduce water consumption or access wastewater treatment technology can help change the way this valuable resource in managed, says Simon EmmsFull Story...

A recipe for continuous improvement success

Added value: the best way to deliver ROI

What role does refrigeration play in the supply chain?

http://appetite4eng.co.uk/https://unigloves.co.uk/fortifiedblueglovetrial/https://ppma18-visitor.reg.buzz/Media%20Partner%20-%20Food%20Processing%20%20banner