This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

Food industry guilty of paying lip service to farm animal welfare

20 February 2017

Research by Dr John Lever, from the University of Huddersfield, looked at the extent to which farm animal welfare is part of the corporate social responsibility strategies of large food companies. His findings reveal that big firms have little understanding of why they engage with farm animal welfare.  

Dr Lever, from the University of Huddersfield looked at the extent to which farm animal welfare is part of the corporate social responsibility strategies of large food companies. and they fail to make connections with broader issues of sustainability.

By failing to fully understand and embrace the principles of farm animal welfare, the research document argues that big supermarket chains could be causing environmental damage and imperilling the long-term viability of their businesses. “There is mounting evidence that improvements in farm animal welfare can be linked to the three pillars of sustainable development – environment, society and economy,” said Dr Lever.

Intensive animal agriculture has a major impact on climate change, being responsible for the emission of more greenhouse gases than global transport. Also, it is in direct competition with humans for water, food, space and other scarce resources, and it can cause water pollution and damage ecosystems. A large pig farm can create as much faecal waste as a small city.

“Keeping animals under less intensive conditions, with better welfare, can clearly have an impact in these areas by reducing stress, pollution and environmental damage,” wrote Dr Lever, adding that “the poor treatment of animals can impact human health through the spread of pathogens.” Increasing numbers of consumers also view animal welfare as an important issue in its own right, but “it seems clear that many companies use farm animal welfare simply to communicate brand awareness through differentiated product ranges. By damaging the environment and undermining social and economic development, supermarkets and corporate retailers are hindering their own ability and capacity to produce and sell food in the future”.

Print this page | E-mail this page


Article image Anheuser-Busch InBev’s distribution strategy model

Over the past 10 years Anheuser-Busch InBev (A-B InBev) has grown its global distribution network using a strategy which goes against the grain for traditional brewery specifications. In place of cost and time intensive permanent structures, it has adopted a design-driven approach in partnership with Herchenbach, a manufacturer of temporary buildings and semi-permanent warehouses. Full Story...

Article image Condition monitoring services for a crisp producer

A crisp producer relies on Schaeffler UK for vibration analysis and thermographic surveys Full Story...

What role does refrigeration play in the supply chain?

Recognising innovation at the Food Processing Awards

Bio-energy as part of a Clean Growth strategy