This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.

https://www.safecontractor.com/mitigate-contractor-risk-in-food-drink

'Unacceptable smell' forces pet food company into factory upgrade

08 March 2016

Nestle Purina Petcare will modify its factory after families in the area complained of a bad odour from the site.

The company has already spent £1 million over the past two years in making improvements to its odour abatement systems. 

After being contacted by environmental solicitors Huge James, which is representing 16 families who live close to the site, and the Environment Agency, the company agreed to make “further improvements” to those systems. 

“Following a full technical review of our processes, we have agreed to make further improvements to our existing processes in order to minimise odour releases from the site,” a spokesman for Nestle Purina Petcare said. 

“These improvements will be made in 2016 and will ensure that the site remains compliant with the relevant environmental standards. 

“Over the past two years we have invested more than £1m in improvements to our odour abatement systems and while no abatement technique can remove 100 per cent of odours, these investments have led to significant improvements in odour emissions. 

“We understand the concerns of local residents and will continue to work with them and with local authorities in order to address this issue.”

Gwen Evans, a partner of Hugh James said families should be entitled to compensation from the manufacturer. 

“The evidence we have seen suggests that residents have been exposed to an unacceptable level of odour from the site,” she said.
 
“People in these circumstances are entitled to compensation for what they have suffered in the past, and potentially an injunction to prevent the continuation of this nuisance in future. Those affected should contact us for more details if they would like to make a claim.”


Print this page | E-mail this page

MOST VIEWED...


Article image A recipe for continuous improvement success

Suzanne Gill reports on the important role that continuous improvement has to play in ensuring food processes remain profitable in an ever more competitive environment. Full Story...

Article image What role does refrigeration play in the supply chain?

Controlling the temperature of food across the whole supply chain is vital to extend shelf life. But how much can be gained by food manufacturers through careful monitoring at all process stages?Full Story...

Anheuser-Busch InBev’s distribution strategy model

Hygienic drainage for food safety

Ishida weigher handles 70 products

http://appetite4eng.co.uk/