This website uses cookies primarily for visitor analytics. Certain pages will ask you to fill in contact details to receive additional information. On these pages you have the option of having the site log your details for future visits. Indicating you want the site to remember your details will place a cookie on your device. To view our full cookie policy, please click here. You can also view it at any time by going to our Contact Us page.;2714294;369307;211;0/?ft_width=1&ft_height=1&url=16151650

Sponsored Article

White paper asks what is the true cost of automation downtime?

09 September 2015

Unexpected production stoppages are increasingly unacceptable in modern manufacturing environments, especially the food industry where lost output, penalty clauses and upset customers are just some of the issues arising.

Fortunately much of today’s automation equipment is very reliable and will run for many years, which can mean that the provision for correct care and maintenance can be easily overlooked. Unless there is a proper plan in place, on the rare occasion when something does go wrong the results can have a serious effect on productivity. 

A new white paper downloadable free of charge from provides an overview of service support options that can be used to avoid or mitigate the effects of an unplanned stoppage. This includes cataloguing and managing automation equipment of any age and from any vendor and ensuring provision is made to monitor, service and if necessary provide a replacement route for both current and legacy hardware and software. 

Service and support provision can often be provided, under contract, by automation equipment manufacturers such as Mitsubishi Electric. The white paper reviews both the implications of not looking after automation equipment and conversely the benefits of a bespoke support service that can be adapted for the requirements of each individual department or plant. 

The cumulative cost of downtime is often underappreciated but can run to literally thousands of pounds an hour. Considerations such as up-to-date backup copies of operational software can make the difference between a quick change over of hardware such as a PLC, to many hours of reprogramming if the code is corrupted or lost. 

Many elements beyond the obvious parts, labour and lost production however contribute to the overall losses, including: 
  • Knock-on effect on other systems 
  • Penalty clauses 
  • Increased liability insurance 
  • Insurance claims 
  • Cost of investigation and review 
  • Health & Safety investigations 
  • Additional shift work to catch up 
  • Reputational damage 

The white paper, entitled: The True Cost of Automation Downtime, explores all of these issues and suggests remedies that will help minimise costs and disruption caused by unexpected stoppages. Download a copy today and make sure you fully understand the options in order to avoid or minimise disruption from a sudden glitch in your automation components and systems. 

Contact Details and Archive...

Print this page | E-mail this page


Article image Getting the best out of PLCs

PLCs are something of an industry giant, so why is there still apprehension when engineering issues arise? Food Processing investigates.Full Story...

Article image What role does refrigeration play in the supply chain?

Controlling the temperature of food across the whole supply chain is vital to extend shelf life. But how much can be gained by food manufacturers through careful monitoring at all process stages?Full Story...

Anheuser-Busch InBev’s distribution strategy model

Gently does it

Time to take steps to reduce plastic waste